You might also like...
19
Mar
AI Won't Replace You. Someone Who Decides Will.
The conventional AI-and-jobs conversation is stuck on the wrong question. AI can't practise intentionality — it resolves statistical patterns. That makes the human behind the prompt the entire moral equation.
8 min read
09
Mar
From Draft to Final: What Changed in MinLaw's AI Guide (And What It Means for You)
I submitted feedback on MinLaw's draft AI guide expecting nothing. Six months later, the final guide adopted both recommendations near-verbatim. Here's what changed and what it means for solo counsel.
7 min read
16
Feb
Budget 2026 Tells Lawyers to Use AI. But Are We in the Driver's Seat?
PM Wong named legal as one of the first professions needing AI transition support in Budget 2026. The government is putting real money behind this - 400% tax deductions, free premium tools, Champions of AI programme. But is this adoption infrastructure, or does it keep lawyers in the passenger seat?
7 min read
22
Jan
Legal AI's Real Value: Autonomy, Not Automation
Before AI, fear forced me to compromise. When a client's case didn't fit the template, I knew the optimal approach—but pursuing it meant hours of risk. AI didn't just save time. It gave me the autonomy to make the right decision, not just the safe one.
6 min read
08
Jan
My 2026 Legal AI Predictions (From the Trenches, Not the Boardroom)
Stanford predicts AI's measurement era, Forbes predicts transformation, Above the Law warns about hallucinations. Nobody's predicting what will actually happen for resource-constrained practitioners. Here are five testable predictions with public accountability.
8 min read